Trial by Senhedrin
Well,
let’s head back to the first century and take a look at the developing pattern
of interactions Jesus had with the priests and elders, and notice the
inevitable and tragic results.
The
Old Testament offers this advice in dealing with a wayward acting Jew. First
take the errant brother aside and privately redirect him. If that doesn’t work,
a group of two or three should then confront the wrong-doer. Now, if that
doesn’t work, the desperado should be dragged in front of the Temple elders for
something stronger and more persuasive. And if that doesn’t work either, send
him away and treat him like a leper.
Take
some quick snapshots as this same pattern plays out with Jesus and the elders.
First a priest would approach Jesus and begin a debate. These debates and
Jesus’ answers are documented in the New Testament. Later, two or three would
confront him and debate with him again.
When all the confrontations and debate shifted Jesus not one iota from
his continued radical perspectives and his sermons at the local synagogues and
on the hillsides, the next step is taken - sending the Temple guards into the
Garden to bring him before the Sanhedrin, the Temple priests and elders, for a
really nasty rebuke.
What
happens at this emotionally charged trial is supposition, since nothing was
ever recorded and no followers of Jesus attended. We do know that Jesus must
have exasperated them completely since they sent him ignominiously off to the
next level of authority. . .the only option available to them under the Law.
. . .and so, we will return to take snapshots at the next trial, presided over by Pontius Pilate.
Questions to Contemplate and Discuss
Does this process of incrementally trying to redirect someone from a ‘dangerous’ direction remind you of your own experiences of being either the advisor or the advisee? And how well did it work?
Look for the next section to be posted and for the whole book go to:
bettejeancundiff.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment